September Net – As part of its “divide and rule” policy, the occupation seeks to isolate areas of wealth in order to control them

The occupied territories are undergoing unprecedented security chaos amid popular unrest that warns of an impending revolution against the occupier and its tools. Signs of revolution emerged in the city of Aden, which witnessed angry demonstrations roaming the streets of the city, calling for an end to high food prices and a collapsing economy.

Confirming the return of their popular escalation over the continued deterioration of the Yemeni rial against foreign currencies, the protesters set fire to tires, blocked road ninety in the Mansoura district and blocked the passage of cars and vehicles.
It is significant that the governorates under the control of the aggressor coalition and its mercenaries witness a state of continuous boiling, as a sign of protest against the deterioration of the economic situation and the collapse of basic services, including electricity, ignoring the suffering of citizens.

Special: “26. September»
More entities and militias
The more tragic, disunited and multiplicity of entities and militias experienced by the occupied provinces is increasing day by day, all the more so since we are on the threshold of the eighth year of aggression against our country. Agents, traitors and mercenaries were no better than in previous years, because the occupier dedicated himself those provinces in order to carry out the phase of dividing and framing the provinces of wealth and importance. The strategy is an attempt to separate them from each other, unilateralize and push them to form a political framework within a certain geographical framework, in accordance with the plans and goals of the occupier, which he wants to achieve for decades, and to monopolize these provinces and place them under hegemony and tutelage.
The recycling of mercenary militia leaders and their transfer from one place to another in the occupied governorates confirms beyond any doubt that the occupier is working to use these tools to achieve its ambitions and enable it to be on the ground, especially in important ports and islands and provinces with oil wealth, in which the occupier is currently leading a conflict between the Contradictions that he sowed to reap the fruits of that conflict in exchange for the crumbs of money that the mercenaries receive, while he continues to plunder the people’s wealth through years of aggression, but the patience of the free people of the homeland in Sana has civilizational and historical borders. Preventing the looting of that wealth and forcing looting ships to leave Yemeni territorial waters and ports, which will force the aggressor coalition and its mercenaries to stop their wealth looting plans and review their calculations, especially after the recent warning messages to ships looting oil in the ports of Qena and Al-Dhaba.

Plundering wealth and spreading chaos
The mercenaries and traitors were unaware of the extent of the conspiracy against the country despite allowing themselves to be humiliated and humiliated to their heads as a result of negative thinking and unaware of the dangers of what they were doing as a result of their irresponsibility. behavior in helping the aggressor coalition to exist and control those areas and plunder the wealth through what it does by spreading chaos in those areas and creating conflict between its tools and pushing each other to commit more crimes in those areas, and it testifies that the spread of these actions is the best about what the reality of those provinces says every day, while thousands of crimes and misdemeanors are committed against citizens.

violent conflicts
In the context of chaos and the occupier’s fueling of conflict tools, violent clashes recently broke out between factions loyal to the UAE, in Shabwa province between supporters of the so-called “Southern Transitional Council” in Shabwa Governorate led by the so-called “Aseel bin Rashid,” the deputy of the so-called joint forces commander, and recruits of the so-called of the Shabwa Defense Forces, in the Al-Rawdha district, east of the city of Ataq.

Interstitial qualifiers
On the other hand, there were liquidations and assassinations in several areas in the south and also in Marib, where sources indicated that the mercenary colonel Moaz al-Bakhiti al-Azraq, the leader of the so-called military operations on the Al-Alam front. in the city of Marib, he was killed in a mysterious action that points to the abyss of differences and conflicts that have come to light among the mercenaries. And this action is not the first, because it was preceded by dozens of actions, which military analysts see as inter-offensive liquidations in the framework of the fight over robbery and a position between leaders loyal to the Emirati occupier and those linked to the Brotherhood party. The cities of Ma’rib, Shabwa and Hadramout witness dozens of liquidation operations.

Divide and conquer
The policy of the old occupier, which was witnessed by the sheikhs and sultanates in the south of the country during the control of the British occupier, has today returned to commit itself to the same policy and approach (divide and rule), which appeared in the governorate of Hadramout, which witnesses a systematic process of targeting by causing conflict under multiple names , the last of which was called Hadrami’s gift and pushed him into an even greater conflict, especially after the appearance of voices calling for the so-called independence of Hadramout, which the occupier has recently been trying to separate the wealth-rich province from the rest of the occupied provinces, especially in light of the severe energy crisis the world is witnessing, including oil and gas.
In this context, the deputy director of the Department of Moral Guidance, Brigadier General Abdullah bin Amer, explained that there is a Saudi plan to dismantle and target Hadramout.
Bin Amer said in a post on Twitter: “Some people think that the answer to the transitional attempts to expand eastwards supported by the UAE will be to invite the Hadramout region, so this was an introduction to the conversation about the state as a project related to Saudi Arabia.”
He added: “However, its presence today forces us to face a scheme of disintegration that goes beyond the neighborhood with its differences, and will inevitably go beyond Yemen with its geography to include the neighborhood itself.”
Saudi Arabia’s plan to annex Hadramout dates back to 1963, when the then head of the government of the Federation of South Arabia, Abdul Qawi Makkawi, in a historic interview with the Egyptian newspaper “Al-Jumhuriya” in February of the same year, revealed about the “Anglo-Saudi conspiracy to Separate Hadhramaut from the south and annex it to the Saudi lands.” He explained that “the scheme comes after the British forces left the region, and that the Al-Kathiri Sultanate in Hadramout, Sharif Beihan and the British adviser also played a role.”

American role
As for the American role in Hadhramout, media sources pointed to a dangerous agreement between the International Quartet (America, Britain, Saudi Arabia and the UAE) and what is known as the Presidential Leadership Council, which stipulates that the governorate of Hadhramout be formally placed under a four-year mandate. country, and Shabwa to be included as a fixed share for the Southern Transitional Council, in exchange for stopping His movement and military activities in Hadramout.
The United States of America played a major role in this agreement through the recent movements of its ambassador to Yemen, Stephen Fagin, and his meetings with members of the Presidential Leadership Council, which was under the name of resolving disputes between Council members.
This agreement would completely mortgage the decision of the province of Hadramout to the countries of the Quartet.

Expulsion of the occupier
The conflicts and the end of the suffering of all the people in the country did not stop except with the exit of the occupiers and the liberation of the occupied provinces, which today has become an option for the free Yemeni people who reject foreign hegemony and subordination, long or short, because the will of the Yemeni people to achieve victory continues and leads most prominently front of the conflict, and he is not defeated, but becomes more and more determined. In the continuation of the defense of the country and sovereignty until the acquisition of freedom and complete independence.